In the aftermath of Miranda's case, what did law enforcement practices evolve to include?

The evolution of law enforcement practices following the Miranda v. Arizona case primarily involved the implementation of Miranda warnings for all arrests. This landmark Supreme Court decision required that individuals taken into police custody must be informed of their rights, including the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney. The purpose of these warnings is to ensure that any statements made by the suspect are voluntary and informed, thereby protecting their Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination.

Before this ruling, suspects were often not aware of their rights, which could lead to coerced confessions or statements made without an understanding of the legal implications. With the requirement of Miranda warnings, law enforcement now has a clear guideline for conducting interrogations and ensures that suspects are fully aware of their rights before engaging in questioning. This practice is a critical change in safeguarding individual rights within the criminal justice system.