According to the principles established by the Miranda case, what must be communicated to an individual when they are arrested?

The principles established by the Miranda case fundamentally require that individuals taken into police custody be informed of their rights, specifically the right to an attorney and protection against self-incrimination. This requirement is based on the Fifth Amendment, which protects individuals from being compelled to testify against themselves, as well as the Sixth Amendment, which guarantees the right to legal counsel.

When a person is placed under custody and interrogated, they must be made aware that they have the right to remain silent and that anything they say can be used against them in court. This is crucial because it ensures that individuals have the opportunity to safeguard their legal rights and make informed decisions regarding their participation in any police questioning.

While understanding the nature of the crime, potential prison terms, or previous charges may be relevant in various legal contexts, they are not part of the required advisements as per the Miranda decision. Therefore, providing information about the right to an attorney and protection against self-incrimination is essential to uphold the rights of the accused and maintain the integrity of the legal process.